Pricing
₹1,499 a valuer, ₹799 an analyst. Nothing per report.
Not per valuation, not per comparable, not per document exported, not per filing. Priced on the people in the practice, because that is the number a partner can state without going to look it up — and because charging by the report would put somebody in the position of deciding which valuations deserve a full grid.
Per registered valuer
₹1,499per valuer / month
For the people whose registration goes on the last page. Everything in the product, every asset class, every document type, and the sign-off gate that checks the registration covers what is being signed.
- The full valuation engine: the adjustment grid, three approaches and the reconciliation
- The evidence gate, and the provenance chain from any figure back to its source row
- Every deliverable type — valuation reports, due diligence, filings, deeds, rent rolls, portfolio roll-ups
- Review notes, the sign-off gate and the draft watermark on anything unsigned
- Statutory work: obligations with due dates per state, approvals with expiry, duty against the notified rate
- Exports as documents, spreadsheets with the grid’s formulas live, and structured data
- Signed completion callbacks, so a lender can take a valuation straight into their own system
- Unlimited mandates, properties, comparables, reports and filings — nothing is metered
Per analyst seat
₹799per seat / month
The same software for the people who assemble the work. An analyst can do everything up to the signature and nothing past it — which is a role boundary the product enforces rather than a discount for a cut-down version.
- The whole workspace: mandates, properties, documents, comparables and the adjustment grid
- Prepare deliverables end to end, and respond to review notes raised against them
- The same engine, the same evidence gate, the same provenance — nothing is withheld by plan
- Cannot review and cannot sign; the signing endpoint refuses on role before anything else is checked
- Read-only accounts for an auditor or an articled junior are not billed at all
Above fifty seats
Pricing on request
Past fifty seats the questions stop being about the software. Procurement, a security review, a data-processing agreement, single sign-on against your directory, where the documents are stored and how the migration from whatever you run now actually happens are all decided in a conversation.
- Everything in both seat plans, without a ceiling and across offices
- Single sign-on and directory-based provisioning
- A written data-flow note for your own security and privacy review
- Signed callbacks and structured feeds into a lender’s own systems, at volume
- A migration plan for the mandates and comparables you already hold, with an export you can verify
- A named person who has worked on the software
- Annual invoicing and a purchase-order flow
The arithmetic
Five valuers and three analysts is ₹9,892 a month
That is under ₹1.2 lakh a year for the engine, the console, the statutory calendar and every export — less than one junior salary, and small enough that it does not need a partners’ meeting. The comparison that actually decides it is not against another vendor, though. It is against the hours a practice spends assembling grids in spreadsheets, and against the cost of one report that came back because a figure could not be traced.
Priced on people, not on reports
Run as many mandates, comparables, valuations and filings as the work needs; the price does not move. A per-report charge would mean somebody deciding which valuations get a full grid, and a product whose whole argument is that every figure should carry its working cannot charge more when the working is longer.
Every module on every plan
No approach, no safety check and no export format sits behind a higher tier. Putting the evidence gate or the provenance chain on an upgrade path would be indefensible in a product whose case is that unverifiable output is the thing it prevents.
Two seats, because signing is a different act
The analyst seat is cheaper because the role is narrower, not because the software is. An analyst gets the same engine and the same evidence gate and cannot sign — which is a boundary the product enforces anyway, so pricing it honestly costs us nothing.
Against the alternative
The thing being replaced is usually a spreadsheet and an evening
Most Indian valuation practices are not choosing between two platforms. They are running a spreadsheet for the grid, a template document that somebody edited last year, a folder of scanned certificates, and a person whose actual job is retyping between the three. That is the incumbent, it appears on no budget line, and that is exactly why it survives.
| Legosphere Real Estate — valuer | ₹1,499 / valuer / month | GST inclusive, billed in rupees |
|---|---|---|
| Legosphere Real Estate — analyst | ₹799 / seat / month | For the people who prepare but do not sign |
| A spreadsheet and a template | Cheap, on paper | The real incumbent — its cost is unbillable hours and the report that came back |
| An international valuation platform | Quote only | Priced for a market where a valuer’s hour costs several times what one costs here |
The third row is the one that matters. A price low enough that nobody has to build a business case puts a real adjustment grid and a real evidence trail into practices that a per-user enterprise quote would have kept them out of — and an undefendable valuation is something we would rather prevent at scale than charge a premium to prevent occasionally.
- Prices are in rupees and inclusive of GST. An invoice with your GSTIN is issued on every payment.
- Annual billing is charged at ten months for twelve months of service, on the same per-seat rate.
- A valuer seat is somebody who signs. An analyst seat is somebody who prepares. Read-only accounts are not billed.
- Nothing is metered: mandates, properties, comparables, valuations, filings, exports and callbacks are unlimited on every plan.
- There is no free tier and no self-serve trial. This software holds other firms’ mandates and title documents, and an unpaid account holding those is a liability rather than a funnel.
- Card details are entered on the payment provider’s own page. They are never sent to us and we never see them.
Questions
What people ask about the price
Mostly two: why not per report, and what else will you charge for. The second answer is nothing.
Because it would put somebody in the practice in the position of deciding which valuations are worth documenting properly, and on the week the office is busiest that decision always goes the wrong way — which is the week it matters most. It would also make the product’s own argument incoherent: we cannot claim every figure should carry its full working and then charge more when the working is longer.
Whoever signs. If a person’s registration goes on the last page of a deliverable, they are a valuer seat; if they prepare work for somebody else to sign, they are an analyst seat. It is not a capability difference — an analyst gets the same engine, the same grid and the same evidence gate — and the software enforces the boundary regardless of what you are billed, so there is nothing to be gained by describing a signer as an analyst.
No. A read-only account for an auditor or an articled junior is free, and so is a client-role account scoped to a single mandate — which is the one you would give a borrower or a lender’s reviewer. Charging for the account that lets somebody check your work would be a strange thing for this product to do.
Twelve months of service charged as ten. That is the same shape the rest of the company uses and there is no separate negotiation for it.
The card form stops and a conversation starts. At that size the deciding questions are procurement, a security review, single sign-on, where documents are stored and how migration from your current setup actually works — none of which anyone should be answering with a checkout page.
Yes. Add a seat when somebody joins and it is billed from the next cycle; drop it when they leave. A practice’s headcount moves and a contract that pretends otherwise just gets renegotiated badly.
Not for you. A rate agreed on a subscription is the rate that subscription renews at; a change to the list price applies to new subscriptions. Being the affordable option only works if signing early is rewarded rather than punished.
You take it. Mandates, properties, comparables with their adjustments and rationales, documents and deliverables all export, and the export is the actual record rather than a report shaped like one. We would rather you were able to leave than locked in — a vendor holding a practice’s mandate history hostage is the reason this category is distrusted.
Get in touch
Talk to the people building it
No chatbot and no ticket queue. Tell us what your practice actually looks like — how many valuers, which asset classes, who reviews, which banks you are on the panel of — and someone who works on the software will reply.
info@legosphere.com