Pricing
₹1,499 a manager, ₹799 a coordinator. Nothing per shipment.
Not per shipment, not per container, not per document issued, not per invoice audited. Priced on the people in the operation, because that is the number somebody can state without going to look it up — and because charging by the consignment would put a coordinator in the position of deciding which shipments deserve a full set of working papers.
Per operations manager
₹1,499per manager / month
For the people whose decision releases a document of title. Everything in the product, every document type, and the issuance gate that will not open while a review note is still open.
- The full rating engine: chargeable weight, tariffs, surcharges, free time, duty and landed cost
- The arithmetic gate, and the provenance chain from any amount back to its tariff line
- Every document type — bills of lading, air waybills, manifests, declarations, settlement statements
- Issuance: minting originals, refusing a second issuance, voiding a prior set on amendment
- Approving a dispute, and overriding a screening block with a written reason
Per coordinator seat
₹799per seat / month
The same workspace for everyone doing the work. The same engine, the same grids and the same gates — and simply cannot issue a document or approve its own dispute.
- Bookings, containers, cargo and the full shipment file
- Imports with every rejected row on screen, and the reason each was refused
- The invoice-audit grid: clear, annotate and raise a dispute
- Drafting documents and preparing declarations for a broker to file
- Track and trace on event time, with free-time exceptions before they cost money
What it comes to
A worked example, so nobody has to model it
Two managers and six coordinators — a mid-sized forwarding desk — comes to ₹7,792 a month, or ₹77,920 a year billed annually.
Priced on people, not on shipments
Move as many consignments, containers and documents as the work needs; the price does not move. A per-shipment charge would mean somebody deciding which consignments get a full set of working papers, and a product whose whole argument is that every charge should carry its working cannot charge more when the working is longer.
Every module on every plan
No computation, no safety check and no export format sits behind a higher tier. Putting the arithmetic gate or the provenance chain on an upgrade path would be indefensible in a product whose case is that untraceable output is the thing it prevents.
A worked example
Two operations managers and six coordinators — a mid-sized forwarding desk — is ₹7,792 a month, or ₹77,920 a year billed at ten months. That sits inside an operations director’s discretion rather than in a budget meeting.
What this is competing with
Mostly a spreadsheet and somebody’s evening
Most forwarders are not choosing between two platforms. They are running a rate sheet in a workbook, a folder of carrier invoices, a document template somebody edited last year, and a coordinator whose actual job is retyping between the three. That is the incumbent, it appears on no budget line, and that is exactly why it survives.
| Legosphere Logistics — operations manager | ₹1,499 / manager / month | GST inclusive, billed in rupees |
|---|---|---|
| Legosphere Logistics — coordinator | ₹799 / seat / month | For the people who prepare but do not issue |
A product that is obviously worth more than it costs is the only way past a free incumbent. Pricing it as though it were competing with enterprise transport software would lose to the spreadsheet every time.
- Seats are prorated when the team changes size, so a quiet quarter does not mean keeping dormant logins.
- Every module included at both tiers. No edition withholds the arithmetic gate or the provenance chain.
- Unlimited shipments, containers, documents and invoice audits. Nothing is metered per consignment.
- Annual billing is charged at ten months rather than twelve.
- Prices are inclusive of GST and shown in rupees; international billing is available in dollars.
- Past fifty seats the conversation is procurement, a confidentiality review and a data-processing agreement rather than a card form.
Questions
What people ask about the price
Mostly two: why not per report, and what else will you charge for. The second answer is nothing.
No. A desk moving twenty containers a month and one moving two thousand pay the same per seat. The cost of serving them is not identical, but pricing on volume would reintroduce exactly the incentive the seat price exists to remove — and a forwarder whose volume spikes in a peak season should not be choosing between documenting properly and a larger invoice. Past fifty seats the conversation becomes procurement rather than a card form, which is where the genuinely large operations land.
It follows the seats, prorated. Freight desks flex with the season, and a plan that penalised removing a seat in a quiet quarter would push an operation into keeping dormant logins — which in this product is the specific thing that breaks attribution, because issuance and dispute approval are recorded against named people.
It would be the easier sell and it is the wrong incentive. A share of recoveries gives us an interest in variances being large, and it means our fee falls exactly when your own controls start working — which is the outcome you are buying. It also makes the price unpredictable in a month when nothing is found. A seat price is boring, and it stays the same on the month the audit comes back clean, which is the month it has done its job.
No. Not shipments, not containers, not documents issued, not invoice audits run, not declarations prepared, not EDI messages received. The reason is behavioural rather than generous: the moment a document costs something, somebody in the last week before a cut-off decides a consignment is not worth documenting properly, and that is precisely the shipment where the working matters.
Authority, not features. A coordinator gets the same engine, the same invoice-audit grid, the same provenance chain and the same gates. What they cannot do is issue a document, approve a dispute they raised, or override a screening block. Those boundaries are enforced where the query is built regardless of billing, so pricing them honestly costs us nothing — and pricing coordinators at the manager rate would push an operation into sharing logins, which in this product breaks attribution because issuance is recorded against a named person.
Neither, and for the same reason. A shipment file holds a customer’s commercial invoice, which names their buyer and their price — that is competitive intelligence sitting in an account nobody is paying for and nobody has had a conversation about. Every deployment starts with a call covering which modes you move, whether you clear your own customs and how your rate contracts arrive, because those decide the configuration before a live shipment goes in.
We do, and it is part of the price rather than a module. Duty changes with the Budget and by notification in between, carriers issue rate increases and bunker adjustments monthly, ports revise free time, and the rate notified for customs moves fortnightly. Keeping that current is a standing cost with an owner and a review cadence — and a rating engine whose reference data has quietly gone stale is worse than no rating engine, because it still returns confident numbers.
Get in touch
Talk to the people building it
No chatbot and no ticket queue. Tell us what your operation actually looks like — the modes you move, whether you clear your own customs, and roughly how many shipments a month — and someone who works on the software will reply.
info@legosphere.com