For clinics and practices
The clinic version of this problem is time, not integration
A practice does not have twelve departments to reconcile. It has a clinician who is doing the documentation, the coding, the prescribing and half the billing between patients, and an evening spent finishing notes. The value here is the twenty minutes, and everything on this page is judged against that rather than against a feature list.
What a practice needs
Six things, and every one of them is the twenty minutes
The value to a clinic is almost never the module count. It is whether the documentation is done before the day ends, and whether the prescription checked itself on the way out.
The note drafted during the consultation
The scribe drafts while the encounter is happening, and the draft is visibly a draft until it is signed. What is saved is the typing and the evening; what is not delegated is the clinical content, which is why the signature is not optional and not batched away behind a setting.
Codes that arrive with the visit
Coding proposed at the encounter, in plain language, resolved into an actual code by the terminology adapter rather than by the model, and accepted one at a time. A week-old memory of a consultation is a worse coder than the person who was in the room five minutes ago.
One prescribing path that checks itself
Interaction, allergy and dose-range checking that is deterministic and blocks, on the same screen as the prescription. Controlled substances honour their schedule, including the ones that never refill — a practice should not be the place where that rule is remembered by a human.
Money without a billing department
Charges computed from the encounter by a rule engine, an invoice that includes what the pharmacy dispensed, and payment confirmed against an external reference rather than processed here. If you bill an insurer, the claim assembles from codes you already confirmed.
Patients who can reach you without phoning
A portal with self-scheduling and record access, consent-aware messaging on the channels a patient actually agreed to, and an intake agent that escalates rather than advises — because a triage surface that reassures somebody is the worst thing a practice could put in front of a patient.
Video visits that are still visits
A consultation over video opens a real encounter, so the note, the prescription and the charge flow through the same chain as an in-person visit. It is consent-gated, and the video provider is chosen by jurisdiction so the consultation stays where it is allowed to be.
Where it is shaped for somebody else
What a hospital needs that you may not
Said out loud, because the honest version of “it works for both” is a list of the places it does not.
The inpatient half is machinery you carry
Wards, beds, the assignment engine, census, transfer ledgers and the flow agent sit in the product whether or not you admit anybody. For an outpatient practice that is weight you are carrying for a use case that is not yours.
Role scoping assumes a hospital’s staffing
Permissions are modelled per clinical role because a hospital has a dozen of them. In a four-person practice that granularity is administration you did not ask for, and the sensible configuration is a much shorter list than the model supports.
The revenue cycle assumes a payer
Coverage, claims, prior authorisation and denials are first-class. A practice that is largely cash gets an invoice and a payment reference out of that machinery and leaves most of the rest unused.
If you run a practice, saying which of those three actually gets in your way is the most useful thing you can send us — it is the difference between a product that fits your week and one that fits a hospital’s.
What it is not
Not a diagnosis, not a second opinion, not a clinician
This is a record and a set of drafting agents on top of it. It does not tell you what is wrong with a patient, it does not suggest what to do about it, and it does not offer a view on a decision you have made. The intake agent escalates on a red flag and says it has done so rather than reassuring anybody, and every artifact that would touch the chart waits for your signature. Where the software cannot evidence something, it says so instead of filling the gap — which in this domain is the only version of helpful that is safe.
If you run the practice, say what you would need
The three differences above are the honest ones. If they get in your way — or if they turn out not to matter once you are using it — that is the thing worth telling us.
Get in touch
Talk to the people building it
No chatbot and no ticket queue. Tell us what your hospital or practice actually looks like — how many beds, which departments, what the doctors are doing twice, what your billing team keeps chasing — and someone who works on the software will reply.
info@legosphere.com